A follow up
Mar. 6th, 2004 11:15 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
likethebeerTo something that ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
waning_estrogen brought up the other day. I got this from the lj-site page, http://www.livejournal.com/news.bml.
It was the observation the other day, that instead of "friends" list, they had changed the title to "trusted/viewed by" (I think). And then back to friends. This is the update that was written at the end of February:
The big goal for February was to split up the overloaded concept of “friends”, but we’re in the process of discussing specific development policies in communities such as![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
lj_biz and lj_dev. We don’t want to make major changes in the friends feature without consulting the community first.
I feel like if I write about this too much, I will spin into one of those Escher prints where everything is circular. Really, if I were a better writer, it would be worth my time to contemplate all of this.
waning_estrogen brought up the other day. I got this from the lj-site page, http://www.livejournal.com/news.bml.It was the observation the other day, that instead of "friends" list, they had changed the title to "trusted/viewed by" (I think). And then back to friends. This is the update that was written at the end of February:
The big goal for February was to split up the overloaded concept of “friends”, but we’re in the process of discussing specific development policies in communities such as
lj_biz and lj_dev. We don’t want to make major changes in the friends feature without consulting the community first. I feel like if I write about this too much, I will spin into one of those Escher prints where everything is circular. Really, if I were a better writer, it would be worth my time to contemplate all of this.
